Sunday, December 4, 2011

Crime Scene Investigation

We were put into groups and given a handful of clues to knit together a crime scene.


Reads: Please forgive me, I love you all!

Clue 1 -Ripped Up Note:  
 -We decided it was not a suicide because the handwriting matched Lucas Moore’s
-Flowy
-The letters are connected
-G’s curl at bottom, I’s are dotted high and to the right

Clue 2- Hair:
-Caucasian



Clue 3-Print:
-Plain Arch





Clue 4- Dyed Liquid:
-pH=8
-Not drugs
-Not sugar water, aspirin, ammonia, cyanide, or iodine






Clue 5/6- Photos:
-Rotting Skull; active decay stage, 20-50 days after death
-Maggots; butyric fermentation








Clue 7-Footprints:
-Victim’s footprint; height: 6 7/8 in, width: 4 in, athletic treads, running (?), young child
-Perpetrator’s footprint; height: 11 in, width: 4 in, athletic treads, running (?), man






Clue 8-Lifted Print:
-Ulnar loop







Clue 9-Additional Fingerprint:
-Double loop whorl

Clue 10- Fiber:
-looks synthetic, braided, nylon (?)





Clue 11- Syringe


Decided Guilty:
Lucas Moore: fingerprints are both plain arch, hair matches, handwriting matches

Suspected Scenario:
       Lucas Moore’s wife divorced him, taking their young son. He soon went crazy and was admitted to a mental institute. He broke out, stealing what he thought was a drug (unknown substance and syringe). He left a suicide note for the mother, planning on taking the kid. He waited in the woods for his son to pass by on his way home from school. He tried to take the boy, but the child fought back, explaining the missing tooth on the skeleton and the handful of hair (clue 2). Moore accidentally killed his son and fled the scene.

8 comments:

  1. This was good. It was fun working together and even better to see your collection of data. Kind of different from mine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a good reflection on the activity. You referred back to the evidence in your scenario, which made it seem credible. Including the specific details and a picture of every clue made it easy for the reader to follow along with the clues and the investigation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This was very well written, but I think that Moore killed his son. Maybe I am wrong, but I think maybe his son killed him. Considering all of the evidence, it looks as if there was a struggle, but I don't think the end result was as you said.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, Alex! Natassja, the only problem is that the very small shoe was found on the victim's foot, along with the decaying body...could the father be a little person?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Perhaps, you don't know. And anyway, couldn't it have been that he had very small feet? I guess you're right, but I think it might have gone a bit differently.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't know what? The small print was given to us with the note "found on victim's foot". But you have an interesting theory...it could have happened.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was saying you don't know if the father was a little person, but I now think that your theory is correct. I guess I just had to look at it closer to see that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, right. Got it. But hey, it may be wrong- maybe the info given to us was incorrect, written in an effort to conceal his identity by the REAL killer- who also happened to work in our labratory!

    ReplyDelete