-We decided it was not a suicide because the handwriting matched Lucas Moore’s
-Flowy
-The letters are connected
-G’s curl at bottom, I’s are dotted high and to the right
Clue 2- Hair:
-Caucasian
-Plain Arch
-pH=8
-Not drugs
-Not sugar water, aspirin, ammonia, cyanide, or iodine
-Rotting Skull; active decay stage, 20-50 days after death
-Maggots; butyric fermentation
-Victim’s footprint; height: 6 7/8 in, width: 4 in, athletic treads, running (?), young child
-Perpetrator’s footprint; height: 11 in, width: 4 in, athletic treads, running (?), man
-Ulnar loop
Clue 9-Additional Fingerprint:
Clue 10- Fiber:
-looks synthetic, braided, nylon (?)
Decided Guilty:
Lucas Moore: fingerprints are both plain arch, hair matches, handwriting matches
Lucas Moore’s wife divorced him, taking their young son. He soon went crazy and was admitted to a mental institute. He broke out, stealing what he thought was a drug (unknown substance and syringe). He left a suicide note for the mother, planning on taking the kid. He waited in the woods for his son to pass by on his way home from school. He tried to take the boy, but the child fought back, explaining the missing tooth on the skeleton and the handful of hair (clue 2). Moore accidentally killed his son and fled the scene.
This was good. It was fun working together and even better to see your collection of data. Kind of different from mine.
ReplyDeleteThis is a good reflection on the activity. You referred back to the evidence in your scenario, which made it seem credible. Including the specific details and a picture of every clue made it easy for the reader to follow along with the clues and the investigation.
ReplyDeleteThis was very well written, but I think that Moore killed his son. Maybe I am wrong, but I think maybe his son killed him. Considering all of the evidence, it looks as if there was a struggle, but I don't think the end result was as you said.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Alex! Natassja, the only problem is that the very small shoe was found on the victim's foot, along with the decaying body...could the father be a little person?
ReplyDeletePerhaps, you don't know. And anyway, couldn't it have been that he had very small feet? I guess you're right, but I think it might have gone a bit differently.
ReplyDeleteI don't know what? The small print was given to us with the note "found on victim's foot". But you have an interesting theory...it could have happened.
ReplyDeleteI was saying you don't know if the father was a little person, but I now think that your theory is correct. I guess I just had to look at it closer to see that.
ReplyDeleteOh, right. Got it. But hey, it may be wrong- maybe the info given to us was incorrect, written in an effort to conceal his identity by the REAL killer- who also happened to work in our labratory!
ReplyDelete